I posted earlier a hand that I played, here is one I didn't. I was kibbing during the after -play discussion.
You open 1NT, partner raises to 6NT, the opening lead is the
T.
: Q74
: AKQ
: Q7
: AQ654
: A53
: J65
: AK52
: K92
Ok. pard has his bid. If
are 3-2 there are 12 tricks and a ply for 13. So we have to worry that maybe
do not split. And of course they don't.
The
lead is won on the board, Rho playing the 6. Perhaps we should explore a little. We play !A, !K, Lho discards a
on the second
. Since he knows from T1 that I hold the AK, I doubt that discard is from 4. And we know from T1 that Rho had, at least, Jx. So it seems the
suit was split 5-2. Now two rounds of
, ending in hand, Rho throwing a
on the second
.
We now know with reasonable certainty that Lho started with a 3=1=4=5 shape.
There was some discussion among the kibs. If Lho holds the
K, then the hand can be made. That's fair enough. But before we play him for that, we should ask if the hand can be made if Rho holds the
K. I said that as near as I could see, the hand cannot be made if Rho holds the
K. So we assume it is with Lefty. Fortunately, it is.
Upon reflection, I think a reasonable line might be to win the
on the board a T1, lead a
to hand at T2, and then lead a small
toward the board. If the
are not splitting then we have to do this sooner or later, and it might as well be sooner. It gives up on the overtrick, but that's ok.
Again I liked the discussion. Just what goes into the choice?