Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by blubayou on Today at 07:39:17 AM »
you hit the  WTF comment  box  pretty well, Todd--thanks!  3 diams on Problem C  is at least   "out of te box grope"  As te "partner doubles for penalty and  I run away with 3 1/2   quicks, and a suit merely better than what i hve shownbare;y
2
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on Today at 01:15:13 AM »
I'm bummed that I chose not to shoot for the stars on "C."

Like Joe, I wanted to bid 3 !D as a "waiting-pick a major if you have one" bid. But I was not convinced it would be construed as such.
I still am unsure whether partner's subsequent 3M bid would promise four. Does it? Or does it simply show the suit under control?
3
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on Today at 01:11:23 AM »
Help!
  I really need a moderator to enlighten us why on problem G,, partner's double is "negative" or whatever the panel is deciding to call it--rather than "for blood.  >:(
My other 2 or 3 fiascos I can live with, but I
have put 'leaving in pard's double'  IN THE BANK on G >:(

Blu, I don't think I would classify it as "negative." Instead, because we have overcalled at the 3-level, clearly we have a good hand. So the double is merely "card showing," allowing us to bid on (as I chose to do), or convert for penalty. I would expect some sort of 4=2=4=3 or 4=1=5=3 or similar---and about 9-10 HCP?
4
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by blubayou on Yesterday at 08:36:20 PM »
Help!
  I really need a moderator to enlighten us why on problem G,, partner's double is "negative" or whatever the panel is deciding to call it--rather than "for blood.  >:(
My other 2 or 3 fiascos I can live with, but I
have put 'leaving in pard's double'  IN THE BANK on G >:(

   Too bad there are too few of us to work up a full post-mortem.
(
i do understand, as i attempted one of those a couple years ago but please quote some of these bridge-world guys on this  and I will have learned a new bridge thing in the 21st century...[or not]
5
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on Yesterday at 08:01:04 PM »
Very hard month I think!

Two IAC members made the Bridge World Honor Roll:

Yleexotee with a 710 and CCR3 with 680.
6
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by ccr3 on April 30, 2024, 11:53:47 PM »

PROBLEM A: Double
PROBLEM B: 3 Hearts
PROBLEM C: 3 Notrump
PROBLEM D: Pass
PROBLEM E: 2 Notrump
PROBLEM F: 3 Hearts
PROBLEM G: 4 Hearts
PROBLEM H: Diamond 5
7
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by wackojack on April 30, 2024, 10:29:03 PM »
SOLUTIONS FOR:
Jack Goody
England

PROBLEM A: 3 Notrump
PROBLEM B: 4 Hearts
PROBLEM C: Pass
PROBLEM D: Double
PROBLEM E: 2 Notrump
PROBLEM F: 3 Clubs
PROBLEM G: Pass
PROBLEM H: Spade Queen
8
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by wackojack on April 30, 2024, 10:23:57 PM »
A: 3NT
Tricks are 6 !C + 1 !H + 1 !D and surely a quick spade or K !D

B: 4 !H
Unanimous? Give partner just 6 highs  !S Kxx  !H Kxx and it is a decent game.

C: Pass
Don't punish partner with 3 !S

D: Double
Blood

E: 2NT
I need 6 clubs to respond 3 !C.  Tempted to bid 2 !H and I know how much experts loath 2NT invite, but this time maybe the panel will make this the exception.

F: 3 !C
Who has the  !D s?  Surely opps dont have a 12 card  !D fit?  Even with 11  !Ds that would give partner 4-1-2-6 distribution.  So I will tell partner I have 3 card  !C support.  He will not want to hear about my 6 card  !H suit.

G: pass
 I have 3 or 4 trick outside clubs and partner has doubled for penalties.  So what else?

H Q !S
Looks normal
9
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by yleexotee on April 30, 2024, 08:05:36 PM »
A - X. I think I have to make it clear I don't have the club hand, so X give p flexibility while saying I was going to bid 3nt. If I pass, partner might think I have the weaker club hand, and they have no way to carry on with confidence.
B - 3h - Which is never an invitation to game hand, so p will know not to carry on. This should be even weaker than X, but we have a 9 card fit so should be safe.
C - 3nt - this is a gamble. I considered 3s, but p will never bid 3nt when they don't have a spade fit, so it might encourage a club raise!? I wish there was a way to bid 3d as a "tell me more" bid, but it looks too much like a club raise.
D - 4C I am not letting E-W make a long suited 3nt vulnerable here, so I am going to bite the bullet and bid 4c
E - 2nt - this seems standard, I must be missing something
F - 3H - only two hearts is selling the hand short, 3h is less than 4th suit forcing, so this describes the hand pretty well.
G - 4D - boy do I hate this bid. p can't be X for penalty right? right? so they must have only 2 hearts or less and the other suits. They are passed hand or I would blast to 5d, but just in case I'm leaving room for them to bid 4h.
H - 5d keeping it simple and leading pards opened suit and giving some count hints so that I am not sent to partnership hell if the diamond lead was the correct one all along.
10
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on April 30, 2024, 06:51:52 PM »
CONFIRMATION# 240619220HOLE

SOLUTIONS FOR:
Todd Holes


PROBLEM A: Double
Can't pass--that would show the weak with long clubs hand. Partner showed a max so I need to tell him we have the values for game. If I had hearts handled, I'd bid 3NT. That leaves Double as showing the game values hand without hearts stopped.

PROBLEM B: 3 Hearts
Unanimous?

PROBLEM C: 3 Spades
I hate this. Hate it. Hate it. Hate it.

PROBLEM D: Pass
East must have a bunch of spades. Well placed honors so that every finesse works.

PROBLEM E: 2 Notrump
Although I contemplated 1 !H, I'll stick with the vanilla 2NT. If not popular with the panel, it will at least be popular with the hoi polloi.

PROBLEM F: 3 Hearts
At IMPs I would force game. But since it's Matchpoints . . .
This one is very close.

PROBLEM G: 4 Hearts
Suit just good enough to rebid. Bidding 4 !D is a red herring. Partner is simply showing "cards" with the double.

PROBLEM H: Diamond 5
The HCP do not add up properly. If they have 3NT values, what does that leave partner with? Maybe 9 HCP? He opened in third seat with a non-obstructive 1 !D. Surely it's for the lead. When I get in again, I'll continue with the !D 9.



Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10