My initial thoughts:
Problem A: 4 NT It sounds like we have a double fit and partner has a massive hand. I essentially need information on certain key cards, that 4 NT is likely to provide. With hearts as trump, a 5
response normally could be a concern, but I have the queen and enough length that partner is highly unlikely to make that bid. If we have all of the keys, then I can find out about the two minor suit kings for a possible seven.
Problem B: 4
Where is my weak NT, so I can get this hand described in one bid, then just follow instructions. Partner sounds distributional - at least 5-5 - aces play well in suit contracts and I have three diamonds with partner. May as well raise; multiple single stops don't make me want to follow Hamman's Law.
Problem C: 3 NT I'm not really caring whether this shows a heart stop and a smattering of values, or is asking partner to bid a minor unless he has length in spades, and suppressed the suit to ask me to show a preference.
Problem D: Pass I wish I had bid 2
and then doubled, but I didn't. Now I I don't think I have enough to bid either 2NT, trusting partner, 3
on my own, or even double to see if partner wants to convert. I am now in a wait and see of what partner wants to do.
Problem E: 4
No good bid available, but a great hand. I can easily visualize spade shortness in partner's hand, so the diamonds are likely to be real and slam possible. May as well let partner know I have a good hand. I feel stuck now with a nebulous cue-bid, and maybe time will give me better perspective.
Problem F: f - DAD I like getting my hands described quickly. I have a decent 7 with a double stop in the opponent's suit, so I want to bid 1 NT immediately and Disagree with pass. Partner reversed and I have stoppers in both of opponent's suits, so I Agree with showing the stoppers. Now partner is showing at least a powerful 5-6 in the reds. Should I show a preference with my pair of deuces or push for the notrump game? It is close, but I think the notrump game is more secure than the diamond slam, so I Disagree.
Problem G: 5
I don't want to stop short of game, but partner may have felt a lot of pressure to double with only three hearts. I have a better chance of surviving opposite xx in diammonds than opposite AKx in hearts and needing to ruff one or two spades.
Problem H:
9 A trump seems safest.
Sets like this one make me see the wisdom of Ken Berg in opting out of MSC. Still would love to hear his comments though; always thoughtful.