We cant IMAGINE any participant missing the summaries, but a good P.R. move anyway, Jim!
A rehash on the lead problem: 22 of the 27(28) panelists commented, and only TWO of the many in the "pass/give diamond-ruff" majority expected partner to also provide the setting trick as well (Steve Garner & Gary Cohler) All the others considered it just a hope, and a possibly forlorn one, eg:
[ZIA: "The double says he's ruffing something, not promising to beat the contract. I hope he has a plan"]Add those approx 15 or 16 doubters to the 5 more who voted with their feet (7
!) and I read this as a 5 to 1 landslide for the position that somebody with a Lightner Double "Just does it--let the chips fall where they may regarding the SETTING tricks"
One other set-up I don't think the IAC even mentioned is the idea that dummy has a huge 7-4-?-? in the majors and our pard has 11 minor cards and 0=2 majors. At least 3 panelists found that less unbelievable than my belief that pard has 2 hearts and 11 black cards. But the moderator gently stomped on this being the case, noting that if he did have such, he would bail out to 6 spades
"in a New York minute", rather than play victim to the Lightner. (Unless he had SUCH a moose that he was confident of the remaining 12 tricks, hey?)