Chew the Fat! > IAC & Master Solvers Club

2023 AUGUST MSC

(1/3) > >>

Masse24:
AUGUST 2023 MSC
Deadline: JUNE 30 at 11:59 p.m. (ET)

Submit your AUGUST MSC responses here: The Bridge World - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB

BWS 2017 System: BWS 2017
BWS 2017 POLLS, CHANGES AND ADDITIONS: BWS 2017 - Polls, Changes, and Additions

* Bridge World Standard 2017 (BWS or BWS2017) is effective beginning with the January 2017 Master Solvers' Club problems. This page shows (1) the results of the panelist polls that were used to adjust the system; and (2) the changes in and the additions to Bridge World Standard 2001 (BWS2001) that were made.
In the listings of the questions and answers, an asterisk indicates the BWS2001 agreement; the proportion of the expert votes for each item, rounded to the nearest percent, is shown in brackets.
IAC Forum MSC Scores

If you post to The Bridge World you will receive a confirmation immediately and by email. It is preferred that you copy/paste that confirmation as it is easy to read due to the formatting. (Thanks!)

Also, if you post to The Bridge World those will be your official bids. If you make a mistake (try not to as it has happened), you must live with it.

*     *     *

blubayou:
PROBLEM A:>>  Blackwood is not good enough (unless pard has ONLY TWO keycards !?) The chain of cue bids that I have come up with  is to first show my stiff spade,  then rebid  5 !D  over partner's 5 !C -- then leave the final push to north.  Rather than doing that, I'm about ready to just raise us to 5 !H .  Passing 4 !H  is out.
  Put these two 3 key-card dummys across from our J, QJxxxxx, Ax, QJ8x ... (a) KQx, AKxx, xxx, AKX or
(b) Qxx, AKxx, Kx, AKxx.  (a)  is near hopeless and (b) is ice cold, and we are out of room for more inquiries below slam level.  The only try that gets partner to help solve the diamond problem is to cue  that QJxx!  Then there is a chance he will find a cue in diamonds convenient ifhe has that king, or that he will have 4 1/2 to 5  quick-tricks if he decides to cue the spadeA  ,above the 5 heart level.
                                                 ---Five Clubs---

PROBLEM B:>>  ---Four Diamonds---     What else?  Are we supposed to admit to having 2 baby hearts now instead?


Problem C:>>  impossible.  will roll my 4-sided dice on June 30th, probably.


Problem D:>>  This is a full ace better than a double of 1 !S .  Almost a "breather" to raise here, compared to #@!!&* problem C.   If you switch the suit doubled to a minor, I really consider raising to game.-(holding back because 1NT after a X of one SPADE is sometimes done without the values it should have)
                                                 ---Two Notrump---


Problem E>>  Cannot think of any bid that isn't a diamond raise.  What level of Diamonds is higher than "four" and lower than "six"??
                                               ---Five Diamonds---                              Notoce I expect the law of total tricks number to be off by about THREE:  Trumps being  7 + 8= 15, while Tricks being 7 + 11 = 18...wazzup with that??

Problem F:>>  Passing 1 spade is completely wrong,  so "D" for disagree;  2NT over pard's 2H might be unanimous,  so "DA_";
As for part three, we should realize that so far we have not shown ANY useful values  for a red-hand 6-5  , so 4 !D  now is pretty wimpy, given our black ACE and lovely  heart Q....I would hope partner has AKxxx+AKxxxx  or better and give him 5 !D , but maybe I'm dreaming.  Disagreeing with four diamonds so i vote...
                                                      ---DAD---

Problem G:>>  I am about equally afraid of a heart trump suit getting blown sky high as of any contract having three inescapable holes :( .  Almost ready to wimp out and bid four-only   !D s!
                                                ---Four Hearts---

jcreech:
My initial thoughts:

Problem A:  4 NT  It sounds like we have a double fit and partner has a massive hand.  I essentially need information on certain key cards, that 4 NT is likely to provide.  With hearts as trump, a 5 !S response normally could be a concern, but I have the queen and enough length that partner is highly unlikely to make that bid.  If we have all of the keys, then I can find out about the two minor suit kings for a possible seven.

Problem B:  4 !D  Where is my weak NT, so I can get this hand described in one bid, then just follow instructions.  Partner sounds distributional - at least 5-5 - aces play well in suit contracts and I have three diamonds with partner.  May as well raise; multiple single stops don't make me want to follow Hamman's Law.

Problem C:  3 NT  I'm not really caring whether this shows a heart stop and a smattering of values, or is asking partner to bid a minor unless he has length in spades, and suppressed the suit to ask me to show a preference.

Problem D:  Pass I wish I had bid 2 !D and then doubled, but I didn't.  Now I I don't think I have enough to bid either 2NT, trusting partner, 3 !D on my own, or even double to see if partner wants to convert.  I am now in a wait and see of what partner wants to do.

Problem E:  4 !S  No good bid available, but a great hand.  I can easily visualize spade shortness in partner's hand, so the diamonds are likely to be real and slam possible.  May as well let partner know I have a good hand.  I feel stuck now with a nebulous cue-bid, and maybe time will give me better perspective.

Problem F:  f - DAD  I like getting my hands described quickly.  I have a decent 7 with a double stop in the opponent's suit, so I want to bid 1 NT immediately and Disagree with pass.  Partner reversed and I have stoppers in both of opponent's suits, so I Agree with showing the stoppers.  Now partner is showing at least a powerful 5-6 in the reds.  Should I show a preference with my pair of deuces or push for the notrump game?  It is close, but I think the notrump game is more secure than the diamond slam, so I Disagree.

Problem G:  5 !D  I don't want to stop short of game, but partner may have felt a lot of pressure to double with only three hearts.  I have a better chance of surviving opposite xx in diammonds than opposite AKx in hearts and needing to ruff one or two spades.

Problem H:  !S 9  A trump seems safest.


Sets like this one make me see the wisdom of Ken Berg in opting out of MSC.  Still would love to hear his comments though; always thoughtful.

blubayou:
We need a guest appearance by Kenberg -- who can possibly explain what we are trying to accomplish by leading ANYTHING OTHER THAN A TRUMP  on this problem H.   I have tried and tried to cook somthing up  and failed miserably :(
    PROBLEM H:>>  Spade Eight---

Masse24:
August 2023 Contest


SOLUTIONS FOR:
Todd Holes


PROBLEM A: 4 Notrump
A safe inquiry since I hold the queen, therefore no response (except 2 keys and a void) gets me too high.

PROBLEM B: 3 Notrump
Not sure what partner is up to, but I’ about as flat as can be. If he is groping for a diamond slam let’s hope he is strong enough to continue.

PROBLEM C: 4 Hearts
I haven’t pulled a “Woop-de-woop” bid in some time. Here is a good example. This will either score 40 or 100 with the former more likely. This should (I would think) deny four spades, but still keep 4 !S in the picture should partner have !S AKxx. Does it imply three? I hope so.

PROBLEM D: Double
Not selling out to the 2-level.

PROBLEM E: 4 Spades
Is 4 !C better? It forces.

PROBLEM F: (f)


PROBLEM G: 4 Hearts
Partner is almost guaranteed to have four hearts, so I’ll choose the one-level-lower contract as opposed to the 5-level minor. It’s IMPs --- so it’s a close call.

PROBLEM H: Spade 9
I’m not going to buck the time-worn suggestion of leading trump against a grand. It should score decently at worst. But I worry the Diamond deuce might be the lead that defeats this. There is not enough information to direct me to do otherwise.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page