Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Masse24

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 51
76
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 MARCH MSC
« on: February 01, 2023, 07:27:19 PM »
March Results

Masse24 and BluBayou led the IAC solvers with 710, a tie!  Wackojack was third with 670. The Bridge World honor roll this month required a minimum of 720. Close but no cigar.

NAMEBW-SCORERANKMPs
BluBayou     710   1   100
Masse24     710   1   90
Wackojack     690   3   80
        
        

Also participating this month were:  JCreech, BabsG, Yleexotee, Hoki, CCR3, VeeRee, VeredK.

Congratulations to all!

77
IAC Pairs Ladder / Re: will pairs ladder ever start again?
« on: January 30, 2023, 01:13:12 AM »
How about using this? https://apex.oracle.com/pls/apex/r/palych/iac/

Nice Work.

But this measures individuals, not pairs. Probably a necessary evil since the whole concept of a pairs ladder seems to have died. It at least makes use of existing IAC tournaments.

One comment though: it puts a lot of emphasis on attendance. Clearly those who participate in the most tournaments will accumulate the most . . . "points." Sort of like the ACBL, which is doles out attendance prizes in the form of Masterpoints. Can you create a weighted average with a certain minimum number of tournaments required before it kicks in? That would seem to be a more accurate reflection of performance.

Again, Nice Work!

78
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 MARCH MSC
« on: January 29, 2023, 01:17:55 AM »
MARCH GUESSES:


PROBLEM A: Pass
Partner is likely 34 or 43 in the majors. In which major does he have four? I choose to sidestep the problem and pass.


PROBLEM B: Pass
Stronger than 2 !S, but not quite as pushy as 3 !D (which may be best as it is very informative). Tough problem.


PROBLEM C: 3 Hearts
Support with support. Making the best use of space, if I could rebid 2 !S and promise six I would. But that is not BWS. If I did rebid 2 !S then support hearts later, it might be construed as Hx.


PROBLEM D: 1 Notrump
WTP? Unanimous by the panel?


PROBLEM E: 6 Clubs
I would like to get fancy with a bold 5 !H, but I'm worried it could be misunderstood. I believe Kantar wrote about an exclusion bid in his partner's first suit but had never had the guts to try it. Me too.


PROBLEM F: 4 Spades
Worth a slam move.


PROBLEM G: 3 Spades
I never, ever splinter with a stiff ace. But I will here. I would like to bid a forcing 3 !H. And it should be forcing. But in a search through BWS I did not find that it was so this is my next best "slam move" option.


PROBLEM H: Spade 2
Should be the most popular choice by both the panel and solvers. Am I missing something?






79
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 MARCH MSC
« on: January 21, 2023, 06:35:47 PM »
PROBLEM E:

Like Jim, I am loath to open 2 !C with two suiters. Most of the time. This hand, however, demands it.

It seems partner has some values and some hearts, though not a suit good enough to respond 2 !H (maybe !H KTxxx or similar?). So WHAT IS 4 !D ? Surely it cannot be an offer of strain. Can it? We have shown a two-suited hand. To offer a new suit at the four level is nuts. So what is it?

I think it's a good club raise (flag bid). It does NOT necessarily show a control (there is not enough room to pack all of that into the bid). Could it include the !D A? Yes.

How to find out . . .

Has anyone ever made an Exclusion KCB bid in partner's suit?

80
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 February MSC
« on: January 17, 2023, 01:07:59 AM »
On problem "B" I was curious as to why 3 !D was better than 3 !H. I remain in the dark.

Though Blu perhaps summed it up best with, "I will bid my one card." Still, at Matchpoints I thought the suit quality close enough to prefer the major over the minor. I still do.

81
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 MARCH MSC
« on: January 14, 2023, 04:05:37 AM »

F:>>  I didn't think of Jim's dog-walking idea so was content  with the cue-bid for an answer.  It would be ideal if partner was moved to Blackwood after that--very nice.  What bid shows 3 of five + a void, by the way.
                 ---Four Spades---

6 !H. If the number of keycards is odd and the void suit is higher ranking than the trump suit, jump to six of the agreed trump suit.

82
IAC & Master Solvers Club / 2023 MARCH MSC
« on: January 03, 2023, 12:01:09 AM »
MARCH 2023 MSC
Deadline: JANUARY 31 at 11:59 p.m. (ET)

Submit your MARCH MSC responses here: The Bridge World - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB

BWS 2017 System: BWS 2017
BWS 2017 POLLS, CHANGES AND ADDITIONS: BWS 2017 - Polls, Changes, and Additions
  • Bridge World Standard 2017 (BWS or BWS2017) is effective beginning with the January 2017 Master Solvers' Club problems. This page shows (1) the results of the panelist polls that were used to adjust the system; and (2) the changes in and the additions to Bridge World Standard 2001 (BWS2001) that were made.
    In the listings of the questions and answers, an asterisk indicates the BWS2001 agreement; the proportion of the expert votes for each item, rounded to the nearest percent, is shown in brackets.


IAC Forum MSC Scores


*     *     *


83
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 February MSC
« on: January 02, 2023, 10:26:34 PM »
February Results

VeredK led the IAC solvers with 760.  JCreech was second with 710, and CCR3 was third with 690. All three made The Bridge World honor roll this month, which required a minimum of 690.

NAMEBW-SCORERANKMPs
VeredK     760   1   100
JCreech     710   2   90
CCR3     690   3   80
        
        

Also participating this month were:  Masse24, BabsG, WackoJack, Yleexotee, and BluBayou.

Congratulations to all!

84
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 February MSC
« on: January 02, 2023, 07:16:04 PM »
On "A," I am a little surprised that no one went with 5 !C to show a massive red two-suiter, though I too went low with 4 !H. Partly because my partner has passed.

85
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 February MSC
« on: January 02, 2023, 12:33:37 AM »
LOL, Todd ;D   re:  problem Bee.  POOR values, yes, but SCATTERED values  is an overstatement?
    Ohh,  I completely forgot about that club queen  sorry

Evenly distributed?  ;)

86
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 February MSC
« on: December 30, 2022, 05:02:11 AM »
February Guesses:

PROBLEM A: 4 Hearts.
It’s a 30-point deck and I’m looking at two-thirds of it. We need so little from partner to make slam a good bet. But I don’t have a good way to convey that. What is 5 Clubs? Some huge hand with club shortness obviously. Anyway, preempts work.

PROBLEM B: 3 Hearts.
Although pass is possible at Matchpoints, it’s a bit much with these poor, scattered values. Partner is asking me to bid, and since the major scores better, I go with it.

PROBLEM C: 3NT.
Like “A,” I worry this is not enough. But let’s see where partner is going with his cuebid. If he passes, we are where we belong.

PROBLEM D: 2 Spades.
Really torn between the “book” 2 !S and a heart suit just good enough for consideration. But I’ll stick with the “known” 5-2 fit rather than the hoped for 5-3.

PROBLEM E: 3 Hearts.
Keeping 3NT alive and highlighting the club problem. Assuming partner has a stopper, I want the lead coming into him.

PROBLEM F: 3 Hearts.
WTP? I’ve shown my spades, now it’s time to show my values.

PROBLEM G: Double.
Don’t like 6-4 Michaels.

PROBLEM H: Diamond Ten.
Second choice is Club 9. Still hate lead problems.



NO CHANGES. ABOVE ANSWERS SUBMITTED.

87
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 January MSC
« on: December 03, 2022, 10:07:04 PM »
Yeah, Blu, all the alternatives occurred to me and were my second choices. One I changed from. So I'm fine with the scores.

Joe's brave 5 !C, however, I did not even think of.

As always, the panel analysis will be fun.

88
IAC & Master Solvers Club / 2023 February MSC
« on: December 02, 2022, 03:48:27 AM »
FEBRUARY 2023 MSC
Deadline: DECEMBER 31 at 11:59 p.m. (ET)

Submit your FEBRUARY MSC responses here: The Bridge World - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB

BWS 2017 System: BWS 2017
BWS 2017 POLLS, CHANGES AND ADDITIONS: BWS 2017 - Polls, Changes, and Additions
  • Bridge World Standard 2017 (BWS or BWS2017) is effective beginning with the January 2017 Master Solvers' Club problems. This page shows (1) the results of the panelist polls that were used to adjust the system; and (2) the changes in and the additions to Bridge World Standard 2001 (BWS2001) that were made.
    In the listings of the questions and answers, an asterisk indicates the BWS2001 agreement; the proportion of the expert votes for each item, rounded to the nearest percent, is shown in brackets.


IAC Forum MSC Scores


*     *     *


89
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 January MSC
« on: December 01, 2022, 10:46:24 PM »
January Results

Yleexotee led the IAC solvers with 710.  Masse24 was second with 700, and BluBayou was third with 690. All three made the honor roll this month.

NAMEBW-SCORERANKMPs
YleeXotee     710   1   100
Masse24     700   2   90
BluBayou     690   3   80
        
        

Also participating this month were:  JCreech, Veeree, Hoki, CCR3, VeredK, BabsG, and Peuco.

Congratulations to all!

90
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2023 January MSC
« on: November 30, 2022, 02:34:02 PM »
Please include a comment or two with your answers.

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 51