Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - blubayou

Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27
376
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 March - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: February 11, 2020, 02:34:01 AM »
lead problem  :    hearts is either the mother-lode  or it isnt  --KEEP your big ones   even the six!   deception has no roll in this problem     


I LOST my deuce  [actually the three]  to enemy's  54 on 4th round  with this exact holding in BBO  a week after the msc  set was posted!   


should i smell "RAT"  inBBO dealing???

377
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 March - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: February 08, 2020, 09:52:53 PM »

To Jacko,  and maybe others:  near the bottom of sectionIII of the BWS agreeements,  I found this suprising gem:
  "Slow arrival: Except where there is a specific agreement to the contrary, when there is a choice between two game-forcing bids in a particular strain, BWS uses slow arrival (a jump is either stronger than a simple bid or it is a picture bid with a specific descriptive meaning)."


  I take that to apply to our   1S-2C; 2H-3H  auction,  and I hope the panelists do also.  so maybe your serious slam try inclination  is on target!   But did you forget that clubs is "your suit"  so why not seriously bid your diamond ace? :)

378
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 March - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: February 07, 2020, 01:39:12 AM »
SOLUTIONS FOR Jock McQuade,Portland ORU.S.A.
PROBLEM A: Pass,
PROBLEM B: 3 Notrump,
PROBLEM C: 2 Clubs,
PROBLEM D: 2 Clubs,
PROBLEM E: Double,
PROBLEM F: 4 Notrump,
PROBLEM G: (b6),
PROBLEM H: Heart 2
    I  wimped out of both  attractive  'natural'  3-card spade rebid/responses  (C  and F).  Have grown more content with 4NT for his minor on #F  as the weeks passed,  but  sad to wave goodbye  to  "1 Spade"   on #C.
i wonder how much mark-down  5th best heart lead will get compared to the 4th-best 6!

379
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 March - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: January 30, 2020, 03:48:10 AM »
I hesitate to  revisit our favorite problem this month---   but noboy so far  has conviced me yet  that minus 140  or 170  is a looser  (of more than a single IMP)  4 Diams buying and making  is a wild fantasy,  and if 4 hearts is ON,   -420  wont look terrible versus  our FIVE diamonds,     LET heart partial play,   or hope to nick 4h  without remorse  if we do not.    I vote  forever ,  9 tricks  for both sides!!

On problem B,  i found in the first pages of the BWS2017 summery  this suprising gem:  "when either a jump-raise or a single raise  is game forcing,  the jump raise shows MORE."   so we are all safe issuing the frivolous slam try of 3NT,   having already shown minimum for the heart raise.   I think the voters on this tratment  need more work, however.

380
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 March - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: January 22, 2020, 05:06:20 AM »

PROBLEM A :>>     East hasn't a prayer of having a 2-level free-bid,  so he will pass when raised.   If opener puts him in game when I pass,  and [surprise]  it is makeable,  are we going to save red vs. not?   That's 500  folks.This looks like 9 for each side to me  quite often, so I let sleeping dogs lie,  not even trying to eke out the 1 IMP  for 4 diamonds -100.       ---  PASS now,  and sell out to 3 hearts, also.

PROBLEM B: >>  The first step here is to realize  that this is a mere opening hand after all.  The second  is to research BWS agreements about what a LEAP TO 4 HEARTS would have meant.  (Is it some kind of "picture bid", or is it "Drop-dead unless you have all the goodies").  But given all that I am making the hinted-at mild slam try of 3NT -- because of the top cards and great hearts.  i fantasize pard's4 club cue, so i can get the diamond ace of my chest  then let 4H  alone  if that comes next.  May Brigita have mercy on my soul.    -------3NT

PROBLEM C:>>  This problem  made me recall the habit of the Big Gun  panelists  of the 50s--70s  to ABSTAIN  when they simply could not swallow the bidding dictated to them  ie: opening one club. But that time is gone   along with the dream-auction of  "1D, 1H; 2C, 2D; 2NT".    LETS avoid the distortion of both size and shape in a 1NT rebid,  and try another one of those cute 3-card 1 spade rebid.                        ------ 1S    (scoring 30 this month)

PROBLEM D:>>            ---- 3C

PROBLEM E:>>  Three-only choices.  I  cross off the 1NT overcall  because the tight AK  do not provide enough bang for the buck.  I like to expect to play my 1NT overcalls  and make them,  and those diamonds are a bad start at doing this.  Coin toss between  Double  and One Spade came ut "Double"                     -----DOUBLE


PROBLEM F:>>    Too hard;  maybe Feb9th   lightning will have struck.    ---tabled


PROBLEM G:>>   In the Bronze Age,  this was a 3NT opener. I miss those days.  So obviously,  i am in for 3NT  on round two.        -----  B6


PROBLEM H:>>   Playing pard for the heart ten  [ or maybe just the eight], for all the marbles. Cannot dream up a reason to lead the honest 4th-best -- pard's roll  on this one  is probably just to avoid revoking                     ------ HEART DEUCE

381
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 February - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: January 20, 2020, 11:21:39 PM »
I will move this to MARCH thread when it gets started:)  Have got LOTS of typing  for March,  and need to get started!        MARCH PROBLEM A :
     East hasn't a prayer of having a 2-level free-bid,  so he will pass when raised.   If opener puts him in game when I pass,  and [suprise]  it is makeable,  are we going to save red vs. not?   That's 500  folks.This looks like 9 for each side to me  quite often, so I let sleeping dogs lie,  not even trying to eke out the 1 IMP  for 4 diamonds -100.       ---  PASS now,  and sell out to 3 hearts, also.

382
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 February - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: January 14, 2020, 07:23:58 AM »
[problem B, of course]
     To my esteemed senior members  (who outscored me by 150 pts or more anyway , this month):  You cannot  'outsmart the MSC panel!   If your better bid  is too deep for them, and the rejected "no-brainer" bid is chosen by a majority or even a plurality,   the peasants will get the 100,   and you will get 40 or less.  I commend you three for tanking honor roll placements  sticking to the bid you 'love' --  and the new gal who actually bid TWO spades --my homemade system-bid  which 2-3 panelist actually chose(!?!?!?)
     I think we should all  'vote our heart's desire" once a month,   but that is not actually  our job --  it is the 25 panelists' job.
    p,s.  problem D  ....-- AQTx, Jxxx, AQJxx    IS a trap pass,   and we all knew that 2C overcall would get the 100,  but i voted my heart  --trap-pass and lucily got Best of the Also-Rans  70 pts  not the 20  that sometimes comes from being stubborn like this :)

383
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 February - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: January 10, 2020, 04:21:45 PM »
A hearty welom  to our forum Marylin Li!   your thoughts are beauties.  Especially my hat is off to you for meaking the RIGHT bid  on problem B,  even though we will score 10 or 20 for it:( because a couple of the panelist will mention it, but choose 3D anyway:(
  <quote>

2S.  It is a jump reverse, also lying about S suit, but I feel the lie can be expected more than 1S. I tend to make a lying jump reverse in this situation. And more importantly, it shows my strength. I go with this bid."
also in awe of your leaving the trap double of one spade  on # F   ("Two to HIT; Four to SIT?).  Bold indeed,  and I wish your pair godspeed on your way to +500  or the matchpoint equivalent:):)

384
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 February - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: January 07, 2020, 06:17:18 PM »
I did it.   stuck with my day-one impressions all the way through.   except for thelead problem which i misread  (  low heart is for GAME bid--very silly vs point-count NT slam bid).
problem F  i should have switched to 2NT rather than the "cue-bid"  as my spade holding may need lead protection more than partner's hearts do, but who knows,  we may be headed for somewhere else than 2 or 3  notrump?

SOLUTIONS FOR jock mcQuadeportland ORU.S.A
.PROBLEM A: 2 Spades
PROBLEM B: 3 Diamonds
PROBLEM C: (a3)
PROBLEM D: Pass
PROBLEM E: 2 Notrump
PROBLEM F: 2 Spades
PROBLEM G: Double
PROBLEM H: Club 3[

385
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 February - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: December 29, 2019, 04:05:39 PM »
Firstly,   "AMEN"  to Masse24's  every thought on problem C.
Secondly,  it seems that a LOT of my simple-minded first thoughts will probably be my final answer!     Like all 7 of the bidding problems!  This has never happened.
   A:>>    2 spades.    not stretching to jump with diamond xxx.
   B:>>    3!D     In 1980  I inherited a giant stack of Bridge Worlds,  and soon noticed this version of their Death Hand  coming up every other month or so.  I got my 3 regular pards to agree  that 2!S rebid showed THIS HAND  more or less [ie: strength in spades in a jump-rebid hand].   and we seldom regretted it.  But  we cant bid that in the MSC can we.
   C:>>   (a3)   see masse's above
   D:>>   pass   This hand GOES WITH  problem F ,  doesn't it
    E:>>     2NT       good nine pretending to be eleven.
    F:>>     2!S       note informs us that pard may very well have hand D,  so I have no excuse to dog it now,  and no need to GUESS which major he is lame in,either.
   G:>>    double
   H:>>      4th-down heart.

386
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 January - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: December 04, 2019, 10:40:16 PM »
Jock McQuade
Portland OR, U.S.A.
problem A:      Pass
PROBLEM B: 3 Notrump
PROBLEM C: 3 Hearts
PROBLEM D: 1 Notrump
PROBLEM E: (b1)
PROBLEM F: 3 Hearts
problem G:      Pass
PROBLEM H: Diamond Ace
    Problem A  and G  still give me the creeps;  I especially would hope  that in this imaginary world  I would not be tempted to leave in a reopening double of  1H overcall--  but that is the only consistent second call pointed to by this first turn pass :(

387
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 January - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: November 29, 2019, 03:55:15 PM »
B>>  3NT is MORE correct with an imaginary expert partner  than with some live one.   If it is  doomed by his trash spade holding,  he will know and take measures--he knows what your bid means.  Same for slam hands.      --    3NT

C>>  i suppose this is a game-try holding  but i am a "glass-half-empty"  guy  about that.  I am jumping to avoid the embarrassment of having opps somehow find 3 of a minor,  and leaving that to pard to deal with having a totally wrong message about my hand.     ---3 Hearts

E>>  Where better to bid the "theoretically correct" reverse into AQX  than in bidding contest?   No regrets about further-bidding snafus!   Besides, the panel  has jumped at the chance to do it  since i was eight.    2 Hearts

F>>  I found easily that FIT JUMPS BY ADVANCER are ratified in BWS2017 system notes,  so this becomes a no-brainer ---  3 hearts

   I wonder if the panelists vote to get max scores  or vote their true heart?   I suppose it is  their "job"  to do the latter and leave the handicapping to  us customers,  yes?








a

388
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 January - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: November 20, 2019, 05:16:30 AM »
jan, 2020:
A:>>  since  ELC double and correct to diamonds  is  not allowed,   I am 'trapping'  on Jxx in spades  :(                                                  --pass
B:>>  the footnote says it all!    trying to right-side 3NT  with club jump-shift  is fun  if we are shooting?                                           --3NT
C:>>    what can possibly go wrong,  if i rebid .....                                                                                                                                    --3 hearts
D:>>    in life,  i bid 1NT over a double  withouth a thought of anything else --  but i may change my mind in a week or two.....                     --1 notrump
E:>>    never pass up a chance  to reverse into  AQx suit  in the MSC!   an oldie but goodie  for 60 years!                                                    -- 2 hearts
F:>>    ifi t's goulash void-splinter raise of diamonds,  but here, ride the tiger  with a 2 heart advance                                                          -- 2 hearts
G:>>   first guess is go for the throat  at 1 heart,  but when i sober up,  will probably fall from grace                                                             -- pass
H:>>   leading my trump void.  if that is barred,  then my good suit.                                                                                                           -- diamond ace

389
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: Master Solvers Club - December 2019
« on: November 14, 2019, 04:27:24 AM »
PROBLEM A:2 Clubs  loosing out to  diamond raise on three - fine.  but  100 versus FOURTY  is ridiculous! 
PROBLEM B:    this sucks!  i disagree responsive double here,   but moderator found a valid  MSC-standard support for the idea  for my 4-minor-- (30)
PROBLEM C: 1 Notrump  whoopie-  almost a no brainer  but not quite                                                                                     (100)
PROBLEM D: Double !!  the iac hated this  but i THOuGHT i knew my ACBL champs  would go with me  and for once...(100)
PROBLEM E: 2 Diamonds  clown bidding by our betters -- Jxx is a stopper  FOOIE--  bu accepting the 90 for  4SF  without a net  (90)
PROBLEM F:  2NT                                                                                                                                                                           (30)
PROBLEM G:   I will bid the 'fancy'  3 diamonds  until i die    but requres pard to be totally focused.
  will take my lumps vs  the simple raise                                                                                                                                       (60)
PROBLEM H: Heart 10      !  REALLY suprised to  beat out diamond ace lead  for a top  i never thought of diam ideas!       (100)
After painful searching,  i found NO BWS decision that  " [2x]  double  [3x]  double"                    550     550  is responsive -- SO IT IS NOT.  So problem B remains the bloody mess i thought it was 3 weeks ago    <pay me.boss>

390
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: Master Solvers Club - December 2019
« on: November 08, 2019, 12:50:56 AM »
,,,
PROBLEM A:2 Clubs  loosing out to  diamond raise on three - fine.  but  100 versus FOURTY  is ridiculous!   (40)
PROBLEM B: 4 Clubs   moderator dug out  an obsure but correct agreement that double in this bidding is responsive i hate it (30)
PROBLEM C: 1 Notrump  whoopie-  almost a no brainer  but not quite                                                                                     (100)
PROBLEM D: Double !!  the iac hated this  but i THOuGHT i knew my ACBL champs  would go with me  and for once...:)(100)
PROBLEM E: 2 Diamonds  clown bidding by our betters -- Jxx is a stopper  FOOIE--  bu accepting the 90                             (90)
PROBLEM F: 2 Notrump                                               ok  i can't play BAM,  but i love it accepting my wimpy    ---->>        (30)
PROBLEM G: 3 Di   3 diams is correct  but requres pard to be totally focused.  will take my lumps vs  the simple raise          (60)
PROBLEM H: Heart 10      !  REALLY suprised to  beat out diamond ace lead  for a top  i never thought of diam ideas!       (100)
After painful searching,  i found NO BWS decision that  " [2x]  double  [3x]  double"                    550     550
  is responsive -- SO IT IS NOT.  So problem B remains the bloody mess i thought it was 3 weeks ago    <pay me.boss>

Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27