Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - blubayou

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27
361
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 July - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: June 08, 2020, 01:37:04 PM »
Anyone have any words of wisdom on PROBLEM E?
 
I could go with any of about four answers -- none of them based on a moment of clarity. I usually have some clue. Not here.

Help?  :-\

Blu says Pass
Hoki says Pass
Babs says Pass
I say Pass
So obviously, as a contrarian, you must exclude that option and now you are down to three choices.  I have just resolved 25% of your angst.   ;D

    it took two weeks til I noticed  the opps probably have something in clubs  despite the obvious misfits in all other suits.   but  i agree  that either simple new suit bid is more constructive than  I am worth.   So  we are left with THREE diams  as the alternative bid.  Scarey,  yes?   Have we  narrowed the field  down  to a single choice,  or are you going with me  down that rabbit hole?

Edited by jcreech to take Blu's new reasoning out of the jcreech quote

362
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 July - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: June 05, 2020, 02:55:19 AM »
problem A:>>   (Naturally)      The mentors  have convinced me that dropping 3NT  is an underbid.  They  propose that pard has FOUR spades, not Kx or Kxx, else there would be a minor to bid first or a 13-pt neg couble, if 4-4 or 4-5.   Now, if we put Kxxx, 10x, AQxx Axx  across from my AQxx, AKJxx, x, Kxx,   that leaves the overcaller with  an awesome  Jxxxx  (JTxxx?),  Qxx, KJx, QJ.    Asking partner if he has more than such a 13-count,  or a 13-count with some kickers [ like major tens ]  requires that the overcaller to have even uglier an overcall,  but so be it.   Raising 3NT  can't hurt even though  "I know"  he will not have a drop extras.       Changing my problem A  from pass to raise  (4NT).   
                                              As for "no choice-1NT"  on problem B,  I am standing firm on this one.  I cannot ever remember bidding 2C on this or similar auctions  in 45 years, which for me is more in the "rescue/ obstructive" category.    Redouble is fine,  but it will only led to a swamp of forcing passes leading to flailing guesses   UNLESS pard has a hand that knows exactly what to do with a free 1NT after opps' double.  Redoubles  don't make any money when neither of us will be having 4 in whatever opponents slink off to,   so it is the 3--3 majors that rule it out for me--  not the 'missing' 10th point.
       problemD:>>   How do we get to PLAY  2D in our 62-2 [1?]  diamond fit?   the good old way whick is  to bid respond 1NT, and change 2C  to 2D  is OUT,  thanks to BART (see _____'s research above).     So,  hat leaves me with the passed-hand 2 diamond bid.   I am told  that if I BART this hand, and pard comes through  with the 3rd bid  of 2 Hearts,  I cannot be SURE that  that shows three  (wtf??)   besides which  these are not dream cards to be playing a 3-4 trump contract,   I don't recall  digging this far down  for a 2-level response before,  but look --  it IS 2 points shy of a sketchy one-opening,  so,  2D  is my vote.


363
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 July - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: May 19, 2020, 10:59:08 PM »
The July set caucht me saying to myself  "What ELSE?"   about 5 times.  Those answers i will tack on  "**"  at the end.  Then in a couple weeks i will change four of them and be wrong every time .
A:>>   pass   **
B:>>   1NT    **
C:>>   1NT    ?
D:>>   b2      **
E:>>   pass
F:>>   pass    **
G:>>  3 Dia   **
H:>>  Club 2

364
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 June - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: May 06, 2020, 02:35:47 AM »
SOLUTIONS FOR:Jock McQuade Portland ORU.S.A.
PROBLEM A: 1 Spade  happy to have some backup,  but was never in doubt really
PROBLEM B: Pass        DITTO this problem  but here  i could have been persuaded otherwise
PROBLEM C: Pass   no comment
PROBLEM D: (b3)    having no contempt for those who just raise notrump,  BUT
PROBLEM E: 4 Spades      comforted bigly by DICKYHS  observation that scientific probe mayjust improve the defense-- - 
                                               ..IF  game isn't just a rock!
PROBLEM F: 3 Diamonds   my monthly self-inflicted "ten"   
PROBLEM G: 2 Hearts     kudos to OLIVER  -  my MAN!   for calling B-S  on the first round pass :)   Seven is not in the "book" for a free 1NT,  so   let's call the 10-fifth in his suit point #8, and  salute the empire upon which the sun never did set for  calling a spade a spade!;>

PROBLEM H  Spade Jack.....  ( 2nd choice------------------>??)

365
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 June - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: April 25, 2020, 04:13:54 AM »
Problem A:>>   1 Spade on AJx .  this works  almost always-- trust me
Problem B>>     leave in the neg double..  DOWNSIDE  should be  mins  140---and you and I see 3nt with presumed 27                           or so points having 2 in-cards + 3 spades, to beat. i see small loss  ,often  chunky gain-- sue me!
Problem C>>     pass   "STAY FIXED, WHEN THEY HAVE FIXED YOU"---  my hero,  Al Roth. 
Problem D>>     open 1H,  reverse into spades:   "scientific" reversing rules  do not apply to THIS auction
pROBLEM E>>   4 Spades. 5 looser hand anyway,  and  BOTH help-suit asks  are flawed ,    so, why bother!.  only  SSGT                            3 Hearts would change my mind, ..and i don't need to hunt through  the  BWS-2017  listings,  since i                                    have a blast to spade game ANYWAY...yes?
Problem F >>     3 diams now,  and spades later   ( at 3 or 4). 
Problem G>>>    2!D --VERY distant 2nd choice  =  1NT    barff  (must have read the problem wrong   change to  2H
Problem H>>>   interior-sequence spade card..  jack or ten-- whichever the bws polling has agreed is the normal .  --cannot wait for JULY,   folks!!!

366
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 May - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: April 19, 2020, 08:03:39 PM »
Todd! 
A big tumbs up  from this member for mailing us faithful  the screen-shots of your BW pages of the MSC postmortem--  the best christmas present I have had in 10 years., ;)   
Thanks also are due to  Kokish and Feldman for at least MENTIONING  that the balancing cue-bid on Problem A  is THEIR correct answer.  I wish they had gone rogue and voted their beliefs,  then pat and I would have gotten 50 instead of stinking ten!   So many of us and them  have spit in the face of what they see or assume BWS2017 "mandates" lately   that  I sure hoped for some support there.
       On that note-- has anybody  remembered that the whole direct-sealt complex of  -"Unusual Notrump + Michaels cue"  is null and void  in 4th chair?  since  reopening 2NT  is NOT unt,  but natural , around 20 pts!  So Kokish  and my team are right,  and the other 26 of em are wrong   hehehe

367
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 May - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: April 09, 2020, 04:14:42 AM »
Please,  will you several solid THINKERS  in this forum  get some ideas up,  while you are supposedly housebound!?   I have nothing for two weeks to bounce thoughts with except creech's trigger-pull YESTERDAY,  with which i have too many agreements already!   (Jim  i want to turn your lead-problem comment on it's head and  suggest the OPPONENTS  my be the ones that have some cross-ruffing,  not us defenders.   but of course  throwing winning spades at them  may still be in the cards:)   
    sure hope i dont' mess up a nice set by the re-opening cubid with the 'wrong' two suits  on #1!  .
    much more tractable set of deals than the hateful april 2020  set
  (ps:  did we notice our lionesses cranked utup with "2NT"  on misfit problem G,   while  the boss  just sat on his hands,  and moi  "quaisi-raised" pard's overcall with lone queen?)

368
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 May - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: April 08, 2020, 10:28:24 PM »
I generated 50 deals on Curls'   deal-generator  about the freakish spade-raise,   and it shows that this hand  is a lousy dummy for HIGH level  spade bidding,  so the BWS gadget  of "3NT=pre-emptive raise with some defense"  is clearly better than jacoby 2NT   suprizingly better.   even full barrage of a four-raise  was better than J-2nt!.     
    As for the 3HCP deal with 3 baby hearts support,   it took me way to long to notice the 4th option  -- "NO BID"   all us folk  that raised hearts to two in  the MSC  are gonna get crushed,  i fear  :(
    rest of my silly guesses  i will live with.:
SOLUTIONS FOR:
Jock McQuade
Gresham{Portland} OR
U.S.A.
PROBLEM A: 2 Diamonds
PROBLEM B: Double
PROBLEM C: 2 Hearts
PROBLEM D: Pass
PROBLEM E: 3 Hearts
PROBLEM F: 3 Notrump
PROBLEM G: Double
PROBLEM H: Club 4



369
The IAC Café / Re: Di stories - favourite bridge book
« on: April 03, 2020, 02:13:26 PM »

Jock McQuade here
[/size]    All the great choices have been touched on above,  and I would only  put in a second or third mention  for C. Love's  'Bridge squeezes complete'.   IT is the only one  that never gets pitched when i did housecleaning, and in fact we often had two copies--one to give away to an up-and-coming acquaintance!  Love got the tools for 'getting' squeezes just right in my opinion -no more complicated than necessary and clear as can be,  with his BLUE acronym.  My screen name would be BLUEbayou but thats one too many letters for BBO ;>

370
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 May - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: March 25, 2020, 12:21:12 PM »
A:>   2 Diamonds.   I hope to pull someone's red suit bid to 3 or 4 clubs---and hope the message get through to partner--  but worst case  i may have to pull 4 of something red to 4 Spades.  wish us luck with that.
B:>   Double.    I am glad this isn't a 2-part question,  as i would like to be at the table when pard responds 3 Spades.
C:>   2 Hearts.  The system notes make no mention of 3 Hearts being a fit--jump vs. opp's single overcall-- and would                           3-count be overdoing things anyway?
D:>   [no guess yet]  Here is a paste from the system notes about this situation from the bws2017 notes:    If anyone cans                    sort that mess out for us  we will be wiser folk next month---
After a one-level new-suit response and opener's two-notrump rebid:(a) responder's three-club rebid is artificial, and opener bids three diamonds unless he has three-card support for responder's major (responder's next bid up to and including three of his original suit is nonforcing; otherwise, responder's next bid is a signoff if that is possible; otherwise, it is a choice of games if that is possible; otherwise, it is a checkback for an eight-card major-suit fit if possible; otherwise, it converts the three-club rebid into..."
    it may have not been clear  that my main fear  about responding 1S  involves surviving pars's jump to 2NT,   buth there are other dragons lurking in this travel.  i WIsH the hand qualified as a 'constructive raise"  but that makes a mockery of the entire concept --  so single-raise No!....that leaves only  the "pretend' raise  via  forcing notrump as choice "C"--sad:(


E:>   3 Hearts--with a secret respect for Wackojacks' analysis all the same.
F:>   3 NT.   Spade barrage WITH some teeth.     By trigger-pulling time,  i may be switching back to  Jacoby 2NT?
G:>   Double.   Wow!  Three ugly choices,  (leaving out "pass")   i choose respo dbl   because IF we live through partner's next  bid,  we can say Mission Accomplished   ie:  bumping them  up a level and bowing out.   (My first wife always said  "stiff queen IS 'tolerance'  for my overcalls, Ronnie"
F:>    a trump    The four,  if it matters.   (If the forcing defense  is the way to go,  I hope I have enough in-cards  to get back on that track.)

371
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 April - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: March 12, 2020, 03:02:57 AM »
anonymous PAT (ccr)?   and my other pal  shawn not evn entering??   come on you two!  GROW a pair  and get into ths great forum!!!!
    And  i am glad so glad to look forward to a ne BETTERbunch of problems.      THESE AS A GROUP  ARE THE MOST SICK THAT I CANRECALL IN60 ISSUES IF Bridge WoRLD  in my possession.   Bar none 

372
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 April - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: March 10, 2020, 12:25:06 AM »
I wish to make use of our moderators' fine idea  that we mayhave 'do-overs'  even though we have sent our "final guesses" to the Bridge World:   So , for  IAC scoring  change the mad scientist  "4 hearts"  to  our WonderWoman--Marilyn's   great blast to  FIVE spades, please.    Also,  late votes for spade ten lead tempt me to change BACK  to that choice,  but i will stand by  the 4th best heart i sent to "Edgar".   
     And by the way,  Ken  don't worry about the BART problem so much  (problem A)---  after all you DO have a max supporting hand for diamonds  if 1NT  gets a 2diam rebid! -- right?   i ran 80 generated deals of  problem A,  letting the 1S opening range from 11 to 19 pts,  and IT DOESN'T MATTER WHICH FIRST RESPONSE WE GIVE--on average!!   go figgure THAT!!

373
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 April - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: March 04, 2020, 06:10:49 AM »




SOLVER: Jock McQuade
        Gresham OR

As i feared, no  "AH-HA" moments will come for me this month..I "know"  4 or 5 spades will score higher  on #F, than either 3NT or leave-in of double,   but I stick with my true at the table choice,  since i am screwed for good score this month anyway. :(
PROBLEM A: 2 Hearts   --( seriously,   no two-over-one???)
PROBLEM B: 1 Diamond
PROBLEM C: Pass  --- 26 of 27 panelists unless some just DEFY the system note
PROBLEM D: 4 Hearts   --   5 spades or mousey 4   will beat this score :(
PROBLEM E: 1 Notrump

PROBLEM F: 3 Notrump -- see top.
PROBLEM G: 2 Hearts not popular in our club--- we shall see how the big boys treat me  :)
PROBLEM H: Heart 4--  (only switch  in 3 weeks  --  From "punting' with spade ten )   


I KNOW one thing only about this month :  750 WILL NOT be the cut-off for getting on the honor-roll!  Thank you for participating in the Master Solvers Club.

374
The IAC Café / Re: Di stories
« on: February 24, 2020, 03:17:23 AM »
Hello;  I am not nephew of la Linda Ronstadt,  but Jock Mc Quade  (only  you dozen know this  ;>)
     i read my parents' already outdated Culbertson workbook in the 50's , but the beginning of the end came in my Junior year of high school   (11th form?]   our math teacher was also the football coach,  and on several of our LONG bus rides from Normandy to Poitiers  etc to play AMERICAN football with other nato base high schools,  3 of us were drafted to make a foursome with Coach Close. By term's end,  we three were given automtic "A" grades  in the 3-hour algebra final,  and played replay-duplicate  at the teacher's desk.   Coach must have been sorry to be stuck in the wheat fields of Normandy for 3 years, to carry aluminum boards with deals from a year + ago from Boston, complete with 'travellers'  from his old cronies!   After majoring in bridge in college  for 2 rocky years,  and a 3-year trip to Korea  (  the VACATION end of the pennensula,  since dad was a Lt.Colonel at that time,  and TET  was looming) I started a lifelong series of
'blue-collar' jobs calculatedto  pay rent and card fees.   By 1978 after leaving my beloved Tucson AZ 2/3 of a block from L. Ronstadt's childhood home  for Oregon,  I was dragged by the scruff of my neck into Directing  mostly to get me out of my quarrelsome partnerships.!  Some years,  my director's pay was a match for the day jobs I held  until about 1990.   
    Mid-ninetys,  everybody's favorite ACBL club on Portland's east side closed up,   and 10 families  including my 3rd wife+myself anti'd up to open a co-op club.  (I did mention some of my partnerships were barn-burners--right?)  Then it was on me  to direct 6 night games a week -for over one year, while still showing up for my strenuous day-job.  Things leveled off to the schedule of a 'normal'  addicted bridger soon after,  until i retired from live play around 2009. 
   then came OKBRIDGE,  and after that place committed suicide,  BBO.  ONE fun thing coming out of that online experience was to be invited to be the 'hired gun' in the Boston Nationals'  batch of knock-out compact team events --  a place where aspiring chipmunks come with 4 or 5 experienced "friends"  to grab fast gold points.   Mission for our chipmunk was accomplished,   but i was not the 'shark'  my online partner knew I could be,   so here i am--  a fading boomer that sorta-was but not too much.
    Yet i say  I LOVE THIS GAME AND ALWAYS WILL    -- namaste'

[

375
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2020 April - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB
« on: February 21, 2020, 01:17:18 PM »
It's small wonder that the early offerings covered problem A,  and left it at that!   I am finding not a thing to get on a soap box over on any of the other problems in this miserable set:(  ( Well-  maybe problem D has potential.)  If lightning strikes me in the next 18 days,  it had better do it 7 times, or i am a cooked goose,  but here goes...
A:  2 hearts      -  No rebidding problems in the quizz, eh?
B:  1 diamond  -  3 or 4 miserable choices--pick one
C:  pass           -  forced upon us by the system note, though 50 of my Boomer friends are spinning in their grave over it.
D:  4 hearts  -  now, we're talking folks!   only 4 spades and 5 spades  came to mind, then i recalled the suprize winner from last month--a lead  directing advance of partner's noise in a four-bagger.  I reject "3H" because it's not jamming enough
E:  1NT            - pick one again
F:  3NT            -  ditto ,  this time four ungeussable choices,  including leave in the double
G:  2 hearts     - gonna let your 5-3-2  spots frighten you?
H:  spade 10   - no confidence

Pages: 1 ... 23 24 [25] 26 27