Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JULY MSC
« Last post by DickHy on May 13, 2024, 08:42:50 AM »
Hi Jock, I'll spout a bit on A, as you've started the discussion there:

A.  3 !C/3 !H. Continuations after 1 !D – 2 !D: BWS After a strong single minor raise, opener can: (1) show willingness to play in three of his minor by bidding it; (2) bid two notrump natural (but the bidding is forced to three of the minor); or (3) bid a new suit (after which the bidding may still stop at three of the agreed minor).

(1) and (2) are too weak for this hand.  With (3), a common procedure (said the intermediate player of limited experience!) is to bid suits with stops up the line.  If we’re thinking of a 3N contract, we’d like to know if partner has a heart stop.  Without one we’re definitely heading for a diamond contract.  If I rebid 2 !S, partner may bid 3 !C (with QJx(x), say) which means I can’t really get him to show his hearts as a 3 !D bid from me after 3 !C could be passed by an invite hand.  However, if I skip over spades and bid 3 !C, partner is forced to show or deny a heart stop.   That seems one route to check hearts if we’re thinking about 3N. 

A re-bid of 3N usually shows 18/19 balanced, which fits the point count, but partner with 11 (his 2 !D could be GI) and 4c diamonds will pass this --- and we could be missing slam (AQxx, xxx, Qxxx, Kx) or it could be right (Ax, QJx, Qxxx, Qx).  That’s too much of a lottery.

Do we really want to investigate 3N with this hand opposite a partner with 11+ and a 4-card diamond suit?  I’d opt straightaway for a diamond contract.  The only issue being which level.  We’d like to know partner’s controls.  Though splintering with an Ace is frowned on, that will get partner bidding his Aces and Kings, specifically here, showing/denying spade ace.  That will help.  So, let’s try 3 !H

Without the spade ace partner could 3N (showing heart and club stop), which we could pass, or 4 !C/4 !H (showing KQ) which we can follow with RKC.  With the spade ace partner will bid 3 !S.  We can then RKC.

After 3 !S what would be RKC in clubs (I mean generally, rather than in BW)?  4 !D as minorwood? 4 !H as kickback RKC?
2
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JULY MSC
« Last post by blubayou on May 12, 2024, 10:00:52 PM »
Problem B...Q8x, AKJx, AQ8xxx, --- ...(3C)  p, (p) Double; (p), 4S, (p), __?  If partner can't help my diamonds, a spade slam may fall to pieces unless he has an excellent suit and is relying on me to have a few for his.  If he has neither,  this may be bloody--sigh
                                            ---Six Diamonds---

Problem C.....JTx, xxx, KTx, QJ9x...1H, 1NT*; 2D, 2H; 2S, __?   Bidding 2NT now looks TOO obvious, but we must realize partner is NOT expecting us to have three hearts at all.
                                          ---Two Notrump anyway---
3
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JULY MSC
« Last post by blubayou on May 10, 2024, 12:28:32 AM »
Problem A has stymied me from getting started, as I see two basic ways to go after it:  #1 is that we are already headed for diamond slam and only need some way to get to seven if that is "on".  #2 is that we may need to get out at 3 or 4 Notrump, and getting partner's help when that is the case is the more interesting case to study.
  #1 Blackwood will work out if after showing his spade ace, then the club king king(?)  he de   cides  to carry on over "6D" thinking KQxxx in clubs must be a big supply of ready tricks.  If instead he answers 5NT with the HEART king we are stuck with playing 6NT wit exactly 11 known tricks but good hopes for a twelfth.
   #2  involves cue-bidding all 3 of my side features, starting with "2S" (notrump feature, usually).  it might go like this...
            1D                 2D
            2S [stopper] 2NT [BWS2017 says we cannot stop here!?! ]
           3C                3D  [N.F.]
           3H                3S  [spade ace and/or not much help in hearts?]
           3NT [ I think we can legitimately stop here? ]
4
IAC & Master Solvers Club / 2024 JULY MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on May 03, 2024, 10:48:42 PM »
JULY 2024 MSC
Deadline: MAY 31 at 11:59 p.m. (ET)

Submit your JULY MSC responses here: The Bridge World - MASTER SOLVERS CLUB

BWS 2017 System: BWS 2017
BWS 2017 POLLS, CHANGES AND ADDITIONS: BWS 2017 - Polls, Changes, and Additions
  • Bridge World Standard 2017 (BWS or BWS2017) is effective beginning with the January 2017 Master Solvers' Club problems. This page shows (1) the results of the panelist polls that were used to adjust the system; and (2) the changes in and the additions to Bridge World Standard 2001 (BWS2001) that were made.
    In the listings of the questions and answers, an asterisk indicates the BWS2001 agreement; the proportion of the expert votes for each item, rounded to the nearest percent, is shown in brackets.


IAC Forum MSC Scores

If you post to The Bridge World you will receive a confirmation immediately and by email. It is preferred that you copy/paste that confirmation as it is easy to read due to the formatting. (Thanks!)

Also, if you post to The Bridge World those will be your official bids. If you make a mistake (try not to as it has happened), you must live with it.


*     *     *

5
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by blubayou on May 02, 2024, 07:39:17 AM »
you hit the  WTF comment  box  pretty well, Todd--thanks!  3 diams on Problem C  is at least as  "out of the box grope"  As the "partner doubles for penalty and  I run away with 3 1/2   quicks, and a suit barely better than what i have shown already"
6
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on May 02, 2024, 01:15:13 AM »
I'm bummed that I chose not to shoot for the stars on "C."

Like Joe, I wanted to bid 3 !D as a "waiting-pick a major if you have one" bid. But I was not convinced it would be construed as such.
I still am unsure whether partner's subsequent 3M bid would promise four. Does it? Or does it simply show the suit under control?
7
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on May 02, 2024, 01:11:23 AM »
Help!
  I really need a moderator to enlighten us why on problem G,, partner's double is "negative" or whatever the panel is deciding to call it--rather than "for blood.  >:(
My other 2 or 3 fiascos I can live with, but I
have put 'leaving in pard's double'  IN THE BANK on G >:(

Blu, I don't think I would classify it as "negative." Instead, because we have overcalled at the 3-level, clearly we have a good hand. So the double is merely "card showing," allowing us to bid on (as I chose to do), or convert for penalty. I would expect some sort of 4=2=4=3 or 4=1=5=3 or similar---and about 9-10 HCP?
8
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by blubayou on May 01, 2024, 08:36:20 PM »
Help!
  I really need a moderator to enlighten us why on problem G,, partner's double is "negative" or whatever the panel is deciding to call it--rather than "for blood.  >:(
My other 2 or 3 fiascos I can live with, but I
have put 'leaving in pard's double'  IN THE BANK on G >:(

   Too bad there are too few of us to work up a full post-mortem.
(
i do understand, as i attempted one of those a couple years ago but please quote some of these bridge-world guys on this  and I will have learned a new bridge thing in the 21st century...[or not]
9
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by Masse24 on May 01, 2024, 08:01:04 PM »
Very hard month I think!

Two IAC members made the Bridge World Honor Roll:

Yleexotee with a 710 and CCR3 with 680.
10
IAC & Master Solvers Club / Re: 2024 JUNE MSC
« Last post by ccr3 on April 30, 2024, 11:53:47 PM »

PROBLEM A: Double
PROBLEM B: 3 Hearts
PROBLEM C: 3 Notrump
PROBLEM D: Pass
PROBLEM E: 2 Notrump
PROBLEM F: 3 Hearts
PROBLEM G: 4 Hearts
PROBLEM H: Diamond 5
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10